Sunday, 7 October 2007

Sunday evening notes

I was saddened to hear of the deaths of five young people in Crandon, Wisconsin, who were shot and killed by a policeman in the early hours, local time, of this morning. Circumstances are being investigated.

In Cuba, a train collided with a bus, which got pushed along the tracks and over the parapet of a bridge. Twenty-eight were killed in that incident in the province of Granma, 500 miles east of Havana.

Another question of morality popped up on a day where some journalers will have whitened out their blogs in protest against abortion practices. The mother of a girl of 15 has asked doctors to carry out a hysterectomy on her daughter, who is severely disabled as a result of cerebral palsy. The mother has explained that periods would cause her daughter discomfort and loss of dignity; the girl, Katie, would not be able to understand what menstruation was about. Katie's mother has also stated that she is her daughter's guardian with her best interests at heart.
In opposition, a charity for the disabled, Scope, has reacted with alarm, saying that Katie's human rights would be infringed. There are plenty of women who experience discomfort during their monthly periods, but that is not a reason for a hysterectomy. In their perspective, it raises the spectre of sterilising disabled people who are unable to give consent themselves.
I am somewhat inclined against this intervention, although I understand the mother's motivation and think they are borne of genuine concern. Removal of the womb in severely disabled girls is something that cannot be done as a matter of course, and will have to be considered on a case by case basis, with the initial answer being: no, unless.

6 comments:

  1. I can see the mother's point, but I have to say I think that's such a drastic move. I don't think a person should go through that kind of surgery unless absolutely necessary.
    Pam

    ReplyDelete
  2. There are also some medications that can be of assistance, not always in all circumstances, I know, but, IMHO, worth trying.  Besides, I wonder about the girl still needing those hormones (she's only 15, and apparently hasn't begun to menstruate), and going into menopause now and all of that.  I hope that doctors can best advise this mother as to less drastic options, and hope that the mother is open to listening.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This is a hard one,But i will not sit on the fence. I think it should go case by case.But there are pills out there that can stop the monthlys I would be more inclined to try out what the doctor can offer.The news about the coach crash is shocking. With the Wisconsin shootings i wont comment until all facts are realeased,
    hugs
    Katie

    ReplyDelete
  4. I kind of agree with you. I can't think that it is right to intervene unless there is a medical reason for doing so.  I have no idea why it is that the general public as a whole seem to think that just because a person may be "disabled" in their eyes that they should have no loving/sexual feelings...and if they do it is somehow "wrong"  we do live in a funny old world.  Sybil x

    ReplyDelete
  5. 15 seems awfully young to me for a hysterectomy. I wouldn't think everything would even be developed yet.  It will be interesting to see what happens with the girl.
    Lisa
    http://journals.aol.com/wwfbison/life-on-a-bison-farm

    ReplyDelete
  6. In my view.
    1. I worked with a firm of Solicitors back in the 80's who "acted" for a severely depressed teenager with a baby...where the court took the child from her...and a local solicitor adopted her.  She subsequently committed suicide, the court having taken away the only "thing" she lived for and was needed by.
    2. Learning disabled parents had their children removed as they were deemed unable to bring their kids up (not LD). And they were told if they had any more babies...they would similarly be taken away.  You may know that LD/downes are probably the most loving people on the planet.
    3. If this child in question is cared for by her Mum..(mental age and life prognosis not given)..why the need for major invasive surgery? There have to be alternatives, medication or otherwise.
    In all these cases...and their are hundreds of thousands more...what other people think seems to over-rule..."in the best interests"....for whom? Society? Just another subliminal form of elitism.

    ReplyDelete